365赌球最新网址

刘信良; 张龙泉; 冷晟; 王静秋; 王晓雷

doi:10.37188/CO.2023-0124

365赌球最新网址

doi: 10.37188/CO.2023-0124

南京航空航天大学直升机传动技术重点实验室, 江苏南京 210016

基金项目:直升机传动技术重点实验室基金项目(No. HTL-A-21G03)

详细信息

作者简介:
刘信良(1993—)，男，江苏徐州人，博士研究生，2017年于燕山大学获得学士学位，2020年于南京航空航天大学获得硕士学位，主要从事铁谱分析及计算机视觉方面的研究。E-mail：[email protected]

王静秋(1972—)，女，辽宁抚顺人，博士，教授，1994年于南京航空航天大学获得学士学位,1999年于南京航空航天大学获得硕士学位，2014年于南京航空航天大学获得博士学位，主要从事摩擦学、计算机图像处理、分子动力学模拟等方向的研究。E-mail：[email protected]

中图分类号:TP391.4；TH117.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 16
- HTML全文浏览量: 10
- PDF下载量: 3
- 被引次数: 0
365赌球注册网站
- 网络出版日期: 2023-11-08

365彩票官网老虎机

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Helicopter Transmission, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Funds:Supported by National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Helicopter Transmission (No. Grant Number HTL-A-21G03)

摘要

摘要:
目的：针对铁谱图像获取时人工对焦误差大、速度慢等问题，提出了一种融合全局信息和局部信息的铁谱图像自动对焦方法。方法：此方法分为两个阶段：全局对焦阶段利用卷积神经网络(Convolutional Neural Networks，CNN)提取整幅图像的特征向量，并利用门控循环单元(Gate Recurrent Unit，GRU)融合对焦过程提取的特征，预测当前全局离焦距离，起到粗对焦的作用；局部对焦阶段提取磨粒的特征向量，利用GRU融合当前特征与前一轮对焦提取的特征，并依据最厚磨粒信息，预测当前磨粒离焦距离，起到精对焦的作用。同时，为了提高对焦准确率，提出了结合拉普拉斯梯度的对焦方向判定法。结果：实验结果表明，此算法在测试集上的对焦误差为2.51 μm，当景深为2.0 μm时对焦准确率为80.1%，平均对焦时间为0.771 s。结论：具有较好的性能，为铁谱图像自动和准确采集提供了方法。
- 自动对焦 /
- 铁谱图像 /
- 全局信息 /
- 局部信息 /
- 深度学习 /
- 门控循环单元
Abstract:
Objective
To address the issues of large error and slow speed of manual focusing in ferrographic image acquisition, we propose an autofocus method for fusing global and local information in ferrographic images.

Method
This method includes two stages. In the first stage, the global autofocus stage, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) extract the feature vectors of the whole image, and the Gate Recurrent Unit (GRU) fuses the features extracted in the focus process to predict the global defocusing distance, which serves as coarse focusing. In the local autofocus stage, the system exacted the feature vector of the wear particle and employs the GRU to fuse the current features with those extracted in the previous focusing process. The resulting fused data predicts the current defocusing distance based on the information of the thickest particle, which facilitates fine focusing. Moreover, we propose a determination method for autofocus direction using Laplacian gradient function to improve autofocus accuracy.

Result
Experimental results indicate an autofocus error of 2.51 μm on the test set and a focusing accuracy of 80.1% with a microscope depth of field of 2.0 μm. The average autofocus time is 0.771 s.

Conclusion
The automatic ferrographic image acquisition system exhibits excellent performance and offers a practical approach for its implementation.
- autofocus /
- ferrographic images /
- global information /
- local information /
- deep learning /
- gate recurrent unit

HTML全文

图 1 自动对焦算法框架

Figure 1. Framework of autofocus algorithm

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 全局自动对焦模块结构图

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of global autofocus module structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 离焦距离回归网络结构图

Figure 3. The structure of defocus distance regression network

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 局部自动对焦模块结构图

Figure 4. Structure diagram of local autofocus module

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 对焦方向判定

Figure 5. Determination of focus direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 图像采集平台

Figure 6. Image acquisition platform

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 图像序列的拉普拉斯清晰度曲线

Figure 7. Laplacian sharpness curves of an image sequence

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 自动对焦过程

Figure 8. Autofocus process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 不同输入图像的对焦结果

Figure 9. Focus results for different input images

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 4组图像序列的对焦结果

Figure 10. Focusing results of 4 groups of image sequences

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 测试集上自动对焦的结果

Figure 11. Autofocus results on the test set

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 4组消融实验的对焦结果

Figure 12. Focusing results of four ablation experiments

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 对焦过程中每一步的结果

Table 1. Results of each step in the focusing process

i ^th step	dist (frame)	Acc _dof-1	Acc _dof-3	Acc _dof-5	AT (s)
1	63.649±12.960	0.017±0.009	0.039±0.017	0.061±0.027	0.118±0.034
2	22.678±6.408	0.061±0.026	0.133±0.583	0.202±0.086	0.115±0.027
3	15.404±5.660	0.134±0.062	0.257±0.125	0.346±0.153	0.118±0.041
4	10.891±4.205	0.194±0.076	0.364±0.135	0.474±0.152	0.138±0.027
5	7.393±3.235	0.288±0.102	0.523±0.145	0.666±0.141	0.140±0.019
6	6.271±2.680	0.360±0.130	0.651±0.149	0.801±0.125	0.143±0.018

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 消融实验的结果

Table 2. Results of ablation experiments

消融实验序号	GRU	Focus strategy	LAF	dist (frame)	Acc _dof-1	Acc _dof-3	Acc _dof-5
消融实验1		√	√	29.496±16.882	0.345±0.150	0.578±0.163	0.663±0.157
消融实验2	√		√	81.259±71.561	0.032±0.047	0.068±0.092	0.111±0.123
消融实验3			√	101.528±71.457	0.023±0.029	0.056±0.059	0.084±0.086
消融实验4	√	√		28.046±20.225	0.253±0.146	0.484±0.202	0.626±0.216
本文算法	√	√	√	6.271±2.680	0.360±0.130	0.651±0.149	0.801±0.125

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同自动对焦算法的结果

Table 3. Results of different autofocus algorithms

Index	Method	dist (frame)	Acc _dof-1	Acc _dof-3	Acc _dof-5	AT (s)
1	整图全局搜索法	8.647	0.107	0.321	0.536	17.856
2	图像块全局搜索法	8.603	0.179	0.357	0.607	22.068
3	爬山法	12.926	0.286	0.464	0.500	1.459
4	HH-Net	27.177	0.036	0.179	0.429	0.119
5	Autofocus-RNN	31.839	0.321	0.429	0.571	0.419
6	本文算法	6.271	0.360	0.651	0.801	0.771

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	ROYLANCE B J. Ferrography—then and now[J]. Tribology International, 2005, 38(10): 857-862. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2005.03.006
[2]	WANG J Q, WANG X L. The segmentation of ferrography images: a brief survey[J]. Materials Science Forum, 2013, 770: 427-432. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.770.427
[3]	卿华, 王新军. 飞机油液监控技术[M]. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 2011. QING H, WANG X J. Aircraft oil Monitoring Technology[M]. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 2011. (in Chinese) (查阅网上资料, 未找到对应的英文翻译, 请确认) .
[4]	叶一青, 易定容, 张勇贞, 等. 基于倾斜摄像头的显微自动对焦方法[J]. 光学学报,2019,39(12):1218001. doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.1218001 YE Y Q, YI D R, ZHANG Y ZH, et al. Microscopy autofocus method using tilt camera[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 1218001. (in Chinese). doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.1218001
[5]	BATHE-PETERS M, ANNIBALE P, LOHSE M J. All-optical microscope autofocus based on an electrically tunable lens and a totally internally reflected IR laser[J]. Optics Express, 2018, 26(3): 2359-2368. doi: 10.1364/OE.26.002359
[6]	ZHANG X, ZENG F, LI Y, et al. Improvement in focusing accuracy of DNA sequencing microscope with multi-position laser differential confocal autofocus method[J]. Optics Express, 2018, 26(2): 895-904.
[7]	唐凌宇, 葛明锋, 董文飞. 全自动推扫式高光谱显微成像系统设计与研究[J]. 中国光学,2021,14(6):1486-1494. doi: 10.37188/CO.2021-0040 TANG L Y, GE M F, DONG W F. Design and research of fully automatic push-broom hyperspectral microscopic imaging system[J]. Chinese Optics, 2021, 14(6): 1486-1494. (in Chinese). doi: 10.37188/CO.2021-0040
[8]	JANG J, YOO Y, KIM J, et al. Sensor-based auto-focusing system using multi-scale feature extraction and phase correlation matching[J]. Sensors, 2015, 15(3): 5747-5762. doi: 10.3390/s150305747
[9]	GUO K K, LIAO J, BIAN Z CH, et al. InstantScope: a low-cost whole slide imaging system with instant focal plane detection[J]. Biomedical Optics Express, 2015, 6(9): 3210-3216. doi: 10.1364/BOE.6.003210
[10]	GAN Y H, YE Z T, HAN Y B, et al. Single-shot autofocusing in light sheet fluorescence microscopy with multiplexed structured illumination and deep learning[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2023, 168: 107663. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2023.107663
[11]	HOU S B, ZHANG H Y, MA B L, et al. Extended autofocusing in dual-wavelength digital holography[J]. Applied Optics, 2023, 62(22): 5959-5968. doi: 10.1364/AO.494696
[12]	郭立强, 刘恋. 结合斜变换与方差的图像聚焦测度[J]. 光学精密工程,2021,29(7):1731-1739. doi: 10.37188/OPE.2020.0555 GUO L Q, LIU L. Image focus measure based on slant transform and variance[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2021, 29(7): 1731-1739. (in Chinese). doi: 10.37188/OPE.2020.0555
[13]	LIAO Y, XIONG Y H, YANG Y H. An auto-focus method of microscope for the surface structure of transparent materials under transmission illumination[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(7): 2487. doi: 10.3390/s21072487
[14]	NOEK R, KNOERNSCHILD C, MIGACZ J, et al. Multiscale optics for enhanced light collection from a point source[J]. Optics Letters, 2010, 35(14): 2460-2462. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.002460
[15]	SHAJKOFCI A, LIEBLING M. Semi-blind spatially-variant deconvolution in optical microscopy with local point spread function estimation by use of convolutional neural networks[C]. Proceedings of 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, IEEE, 2018.
[16]	FARNES S A R, TSAI D M, CHIU W Y. Autofocus measurement for electronic components using deep regression[J]. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, 2021, 11(4): 697-707. doi: 10.1109/TCPMT.2021.3060809
[17]	GE Y H, LI B, ZHAO Y ZH, et al. HH-Net: image driven microscope fast auto-focus with deep neural network[C]. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Association for Computing Machinery, 2019: 180-185.
[18]	XIANG Y, HE ZH J, LIU Q, et al. Autofocus of whole slide imaging based on convolution and recurrent neural networks[J]. Ultramicroscopy, 2021, 220: 113146. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2020.113146
[19]	REDMON J, FARHADI A. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement[J/OL]. arXiv: 1804.02767, 2018. (查阅网上资料, 请核对文献类型及格式) . REDMON J, FARHADI A. YOLOv3: an incremental improvement[J/OL]. arXiv: 1804.02767, 2018. (查阅网上资料, 请核对文献类型及格式).
[20]	HE K M, ZHANG X Y, REN SH Q, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE, 2016.